In order to better understand
public opinion around the topic climate change the report pulls together the contributions
from the field of psychology. In this
report the authors specifically note the aim, which is, “to engage members of
the psychology community (teachers, researchers, practitioners, and students) in
the issue of climate change” (APA, 2010, p. 1). More completely, they have set out
to assess the contributions of the psychological field, build recommendations
for future research, and develop policies to assist people in the field to
engage with the issue of climate change (APA, 2010, p.1-2).
In the group discussion Tuesday we assessed that the paper was framed around
the concept of control and this seemed to be quite in line with the statements made
in the executive summary. For example,
in the suggested policies to encourage engagement with the topic of climate
change there was no mention of personal changes or modifications that can be
made to further the cause. All the
suggested interventions mentioned were to be implemented upon others, this authoritarian
stance left me with an unsavory taste.
Tonight, upon re-review of
the reports specific policy recommendations pdf, I have found that they do in
fact suggest personal methods of limiting the impact of the research community
as well. They do so with suggestions such as “When selecting
goods to purchase, buy products that minimize impact on the environment such as
buying Energy Star equipment, biodegradable products, and locally grown food
for events” (APA Policy Recommendations, 2010, p.5) and “Encourage
psychologists to understand and alter their own behaviors to reduce emissions in their personal
lives as well as in their places of work” (APA Policy Recommendations, 2010, p.
3). I recognize that the paper is still framed in a place of control, but by
recognizing that their audience of psychologists are also people who could
improve their habits and practices lightens the air of superiority that I had initially
sensed. Further, by encouraging their
frontline workers to adopt more environmentally ethical practices it adds to
the validity of the messages and policies that they promote.
APA. (2010). POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS of the APA Task Force on
the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/policy-recommendations.pdf
APA. (2010). Psychology and Global Climate Change - addressing
a multifaceted phenomenon and set of challenge – Executive Summary. Retrieved
from http://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/executive-summary.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment